Parents’ paranoia is associated with safety behaviors of their children, study finds

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

A new study has revealed that parents’ paranoia predicted safety behavior use of their children. However, adolescents’ paranoia did not predict their parents’ safety behavior use. The paper was published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology.

Paranoia is characterized by a steadfast belief that one is the target of harm by others, a belief not commonly shared and resistant to change despite evidence to the contrary. Individuals exhibiting paranoia may misinterpret harmless or neutral actions as hostile or threatening, resulting in increased vigilance and anxiety. Such individuals might become overly secretive, perceive ambiguous situations as negative, and struggle to form or maintain close relationships due to a general mistrust. While a certain level of caution is beneficial, excessive paranoia can be crippling, hindering everyday life.

Safety behaviors, often adopted by individuals with paranoia, include continuous scanning for potential dangers, avoiding social situations or places deemed unsafe, seeking reassurance, or carrying objects for self-defense. Although these actions might offer temporary solace, they can also perpetuate paranoid beliefs and block opportunities to learn that such fears are baseless. Over time, reliance on these safety behaviors can sustain and even escalate paranoia.

The study explored the possibility of children adopting safety behaviors and paranoia from observing and absorbing their parents’ attitudes and beliefs. Researchers Sven N. Schönig and colleagues aimed to understand this intergenerational transmission better, hypothesizing a correlation between heightened paranoia and the manifestation of safety behaviors, both in parents and their children.

The research involved 142 adolescents aged 14 to 17 from the UK and their parents, with 91% of the adolescents attending UK schools from years 8 to 13. Sixty percent of the parents were married. Paranoia levels were within normal limits for 70% of the adolescents and 65% of the parents. Participants were evaluated for paranoia (using the Revised Green et al. Paranoid Thoughts Scale), safety behaviors (through an assessment developed by the researchers), and anxiety (using the anxiety scale from DASS-21).

The findings revealed a correlation between pronounced paranoia and the use of safety behaviors. Parents exhibiting higher levels of paranoia were likely to have children who also showed increased paranoia and safety behaviors. Parental paranoia was a predictor of both their own and their children’s safety behaviors, indicating a transmission of behaviors. However, an adolescent’s paranoia did not influence their parents’ safety behaviors. Additionally, there was a tendency for individuals with higher anxiety to exhibit more pronounced paranoia, although anxiety was not linked to safety behaviors.

“Paranoia and safety behaviors appear to ‘run’ in families, which suggests that intervention and prevention strategies should also aim to address the whole family system instead of an isolated individual. As our findings show, adolescents who show safety behaviors in response to paranoia are likely to have parents who also show safety behaviors,” the study authors concluded.

“To prevent adolescents from developing rigid safety behaviors that contribute to the maintenance of paranoia, modifying the family environment that reproduces such safety behaviors seems essential. Family interventions could provide targeted support for vulnerable adolescents who are exposed to parents’ paranoia and safety behaviors, but also help parents find behavioral strategies and communication strategies that promote trust in their children.”

The study provides valuable insights into the links between paranoia and safety behaviors within families. However, it should be noted that the design of this study does not allow any cause-and-effect inferences to be drawn from the data. It remains unknown whether adolescents’ copying of parents’ behavior is responsible for the observed association or if this link is created in some other way.

The study, “The Apple Doesn’t Fall Far from the Tree? Paranoia and Safety Behaviours in Adolescent‑Parent‑Dyads,” was authored by Sven N. Schönig, Elizabeth Thompson, Jessica Kingston, Brandon A. Gaudiano, Lyn Ellett, and Katarina Krkovic.

© PsyPost